This last week, the Hobby Lobby case was argued before the Supreme Court.
For those unaware of the case, the owners of the Hobby Lobby company feel that the requirement under the Affordable Care Act to provide certain kinds of contraceptive coverage violates their religious beliefs. The case brings up, once again, the intersection between public policy and religious practice which at best is a complicated topic and at worst a source of emotional arguments which rarely move the strongest believers.
For the record, I am fairly comfortable with what I understand basic Jewish law takes toward these general topics which is that contraception is acceptable and further in general regards abortion as legal but discouraged (it is more complicated than that but that provides a general outline).
In The Volokh Conspiracy blog, published in the Washington Post, one of today’s posts was a summary by Stanford law professor, Michael McConnell, giving his reasons why he believes Hobby Lobby should win the case. It is an interesting, though a bit lengthy, read: