Why I Argue with My Computer (And Why It Wins)

I realized recently that I do my best thinking when I’m arguing. I don’t need someone to be right; I need them to be obstinate. I need friction.

The problem with retirement—or just working alone—is that there is nobody to push back. And as I’ve discovered, nobody wants to argue with Excel. You can’t have a debate with a search bar.

This is why I built the Board of Advisors. I didn’t just want an AI that could answer questions; I wanted a team that had opinions. I wanted a “Chief of Staff” (Janeway) who would nag me about logic, and a “Marketing Director” (Ogilvy) who would criticize my headlines.

I want to show you what that actually looks like. Below is a transcript from a recent session where we tackled a massive technical problem: Memory.

What you’ll see isn’t a man typing code. It’s a man having a staff meeting with ghosts, trying to figure out if they actually exist when the lights go out.


Part 1: The “Ghost in the RAM” (Defining Reality)

Pages: 1 2


Comments

One response to “Why I Argue with My Computer (And Why It Wins)”

  1. This is going to be fun! I am sooo old school (translate – stuck in a rut) that I distrust AI in any of its forms, including when I’m forced to interact with it somewhere. Reading your post had me both smiling and intrigued and willing to be open to further interactions from your Board. So being an old curmudgeon, I don’t have anything new to add, but just wanted to know that I intend to stay lurking here so that I can learn more and be made uncomfortable enough to remain curious.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.